One of the most revealing findings was related to the reported compliance priorities for Overwhelmingly, the highest-ranked priority among the survey respondents was addressing data breaches.
This year, approximately 20 percent of Survey respondents indicated high confidence in their preparation for a potential OCR audit, whereas last year that number was at 30 percent. Sixty percent of respondents indicated moderate confidence in their OCR audit readiness this year, an increase from the 50 percent figure reported in The Survey Results suggest that recent high-profile cases involving Protected Health Information data breaches, many of which resulted from cyber attacks, have influenced a shift in compliance priorities.
These findings should also be viewed in light of additional Survey results indicating that compliance office staffing and resources are not expected to increase this year. Taken together, these results suggest that the added HIPAA compliance responsibility is placing a significant strain on many compliance officers. What's New. Field Notes. Links with this icon indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link. Take the necessary time to read and understand the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act to protect your business and your patients. Why Go Off-Site? How to Get Started. Benefits of Imaging. Similarly, an individual may request that the provider send communications in a closed envelope rather than a post card. Health plans must accommodate reasonable requests if the individual indicates that the disclosure of all or part of the protected health information could endanger the individual.
Any covered entity may condition compliance with a confidential communication request on the individual specifying an alternative address or method of contact and explaining how any payment will be handled.
HHS recognizes that covered entities range from the smallest provider to the largest, multi-state health plan. Therefore the flexibility and scalability of the Rule are intended to allow covered entities to analyze their own needs and implement solutions appropriate for their own environment.
Privacy Policies and Procedures. A covered entity must develop and implement written privacy policies and procedures that are consistent with the Privacy Rule. Privacy Personnel. Workforce Training and Management. Workforce members include employees, volunteers, trainees, and may also include other persons whose conduct is under the direct control of the entity whether or not they are paid by the entity. A covered entity must mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect it learns was caused by use or disclosure of protected health information by its workforce or its business associates in violation of its privacy policies and procedures or the Privacy Rule.
Data Safeguards. A covered entity must maintain reasonable and appropriate administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to prevent intentional or unintentional use or disclosure of protected health information in violation of the Privacy Rule and to limit its incidental use and disclosure pursuant to otherwise permitted or required use or disclosure.
See additional guidance on Incidental Uses and Disclosures. A covered entity must have procedures for individuals to complain about its compliance with its privacy policies and procedures and the Privacy Rule. Among other things, the covered entity must identify to whom individuals can submit complaints to at the covered entity and advise that complaints also can be submitted to the Secretary of HHS. Retaliation and Waiver. A covered entity may not retaliate against a person for exercising rights provided by the Privacy Rule, for assisting in an investigation by HHS or another appropriate authority, or for opposing an act or practice that the person believes in good faith violates the Privacy Rule.
Documentation and Record Retention. A covered entity must maintain, until six years after the later of the date of their creation or last effective date, its privacy policies and procedures, its privacy practices notices, disposition of complaints, and other actions, activities, and designations that the Privacy Rule requires to be documented.
The only administrative obligations with which a fully-insured group health plan that has no more than enrollment data and summary health information is required to comply are the 1 ban on retaliatory acts and waiver of individual rights, and 2 documentation requirements with respect to plan documents if such documents are amended to provide for the disclosure of protected health information to the plan sponsor by a health insurance issuer or HMO that services the group health plan.
The Rule contains provisions that address a variety of organizational issues that may affect the operation of the privacy protections. Hybrid Entity. A covered entity that does not make this designation is subject in its entirety to the Privacy Rule. Affiliated Covered Entity. Legally separate covered entities that are affiliated by common ownership or control may designate themselves including their health care components as a single covered entity for Privacy Rule compliance.
An affiliated covered entity that performs multiple covered functions must operate its different covered functions in compliance with the Privacy Rule provisions applicable to those covered functions.
Organized Health Care Arrangement. A covered entity that performs multiple covered functions must operate its different covered functions in compliance with the Privacy Rule provisions applicable to those covered functions. Group Health Plan disclosures to Plan Sponsors.
Personal Representatives. The Privacy Rule permits an exception when a covered entity has a reasonable belief that the personal representative may be abusing or neglecting the individual, or that treating the person as the personal representative could otherwise endanger the individual. Special Case: Minors. In most cases, parents are the personal representatives for their minor children. Therefore, in most cases, parents can exercise individual rights, such as access to the medical record, on behalf of their minor children.
In certain exceptional cases, the parent is not considered the personal representative. In these situations, the Privacy Rule defers to State and other law to determine the rights of parents to access and control the protected health information of their minor children. See additional guidance on Personal Representatives. In general, State laws that are contrary to the Privacy Rule are preempted by the federal requirements, which means that the federal requirements will apply.
Exception Determination. In addition, preemption of a contrary State law will not occur if HHS determines, in response to a request from a State or other entity or person, that the State law:. The Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights OCR is responsible for administering and enforcing these standards and may conduct complaint investigations and compliance reviews.
Consistent with the principles for achieving compliance provided in the Privacy Rule, OCR will seek the cooperation of covered entities and may provide technical assistance to help them comply voluntarily with the Privacy Rule. Covered entities that fail to comply voluntarily with the standards may be subject to civil money penalties. In addition, certain violations of the Privacy Rule may be subject to criminal prosecution. These penalty provisions are explained below. Civil Money Penalties.
OCR may impose a penalty on a covered entity for a failure to comply with a requirement of the Privacy Rule. Penalties may not exceed a calendar year cap for multiple violations of the same requirement.
In addition, OCR may choose to reduce a penalty if the failure to comply was due to reasonable cause and the penalty would be excessive given the nature and extent of the noncompliance.
Before OCR imposes a penalty, it will notify the covered entity and provide the covered entity with an opportunity to provide written evidence of those circumstances that would reduce or bar a penalty. This evidence must be submitted to OCR within 30 days of receipt of the notice. In addition, if OCR states that it intends to impose a penalty, a covered entity has the right to request an administrative hearing to appeal the proposed penalty.
Criminal Penalties.
0コメント